A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and an organization director respectively, seek out to construct their loved ones dwelling. The situation has become emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of established residents. According to the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their possible neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted underneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are matter to demanding controls less than European and Irish environmental regulation. Of their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological implications, particularly in a very delicate coastal surroundings like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, and that is partly constructed, is in the proper situation. Their legal workforce has characterised the motion being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal planning disputes, where sights of The ocean are both extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-higher water through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic with the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to Obtain Visible evidence of the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location turned Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times write-up about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that these kinds of steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was currently being encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been included in detail via the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 became commonly searched phrases as readers sought to be aware of the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
With the core in the dispute is actually a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as built, goes past what was approved and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and conditions hooked up for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just looking to build a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Specific Area of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out depending on Qualified guidance and accredited options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as entering the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to change the underlying specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute about design of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental problems, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from pretty unique Qualified backgrounds can find themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier Paul Feely accountant and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-large h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by waist-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court docket must determine whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and planning circumstances. But the human aspect stays central: neighbours who need to Dwell alongside one another prolonged following the legal costs happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction performs at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase beyond that address. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the value of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. It also underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when basic issues which include environmental safety and property rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of normal elegance and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of the dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Irrespective of whether it'll eventually be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin lately.